Post by susanconstant on May 26, 2009 19:12:11 GMT -5
You are not aware of; I posted this on another land patent forum but thought I'd post it in a few places.
Hey guys! I have a suit in the other federal court, appeals. I have been to SCOTUS; I became the first person to enter directly since Marbury in 1803 and the only woman and the only nonlawyer to argue a case as if you’re pro se? Your case is heard upon conferencing but I went one better: The Solicitor General failed to respond thus as I am a pro se case of constitutional authority and original jurisdiction I then sued the US by appealing to Roberts directly thus I gained direct entry and direct action but: YOU were denied all of your rights and informed consent. Hang with me for a sec as I am on my way back into SCOTUS and I have an idea for how we can put the original jurisdiction governors to use: I’m o.j., correct? Well in my suit I named the governors of all the states as they do have the power of one thus they could have been granted third standing in Bush V Gore to then prevent Bush V Gore and/or to prevent Obama 08. In case you missed it: BVG is a coup. A coup in America is papery first and then bloody. BVG? It sat as a tied decision until I resolved it in my favor; the SCOTUS docket is proof. Go look at In Re Susan Herbert 07-9804, “Being American Is A Matter Of Faith Not Of Belief As Life Is Proof” & 08-6622, “A Natural Born Citizen, A Past Actual President And A Current Legal President Denied Justice Absolutely As Discrimination Is Real Thus Appearances Are Deceiving Which Is Why Acting Defines You And Life, Not Death, Is Proof”. The action known only as 11/20/08 is not the same as 08-6622; it is an emergency appeal that was acted upon but not filed. I captioned that “A Natural Born Citizen Who Is A Mother And So Shed Her Blood And Risked Her Life In Defense Of The Constitution, Or, We The People Thus The Protected Right Is Hers”. This is the application and petition that secured my place in US history, lol, as I never went to a lower court and not only was heard but I was acted upon (Marshall said actions not paper count or prove the case) and the Chief Justice may not circumvent the Solicitor General as that then is denying you all of your rights and the ability to defend yourselves.
BVG is 9 as 5-4 as 2, 5 as 1 versus 4 as 1 or 1 versus 1. So then: As we overthrew our governing documents and then the citizens elected a person not qualified the nation died; it no longer is as it was. We are no longer constitutional as Roberts proved as Marshal said if a citizen ever got to the Chief Justice and was denied redress for fully protected rights then we were not a constitutional nation as we had chosen something over the constitution itself. In my case first SCOTUS violated the law and then Marbury and then it violated all of you but I was the only one to object so now I may sue Roberts and the US for liability. To overthrow the law is one thing; to then elect a leader that is acting in violation of our law on the way into the office? A coup by the Congress backed by private business as Obama used private funds. This is where you were and are supposed to get out your pitch forks and torches but you did not. You’re spirit was broken as that is what happens if you wholly violate the law, even the spirit of the law itself: you break people. It also makes me the acting, legal President and Commander. I told Roberts: The citizens already elected me once; they already voted for me once: I was my grammar school class President. When in SCOTUS I actually issued Executive Orders and signed them as such and SCOTUS obeyed. I will get to my point in a sec and I’ll give you a link to my federal appeals brief but here is what I told a person asking me about police power to enforce the collection of unjust property taxes. Pardon the capitals, as that is how I sent it:
First from a letter to John Roberts re land patents and allodial title as he is a defendant so I can and may give him legal advice as it does not constitute ex parte if he’s defending himself against me: “He (person claiming allodial title) claims authority under the contract I entered that we had with the American Indians, which we inherited from Spain with the LA Purchase. As he proved treason as he asked and got a confession from a former Senator he knew the law was being overturned as early as 2000. I have to check that date. He knew BVG was unconstitutional but he did not own all of the knowledge yet he still acted. He argues all the contracts are undone back to that one. He actually fulfilled all terms of US law and of this 400 year old contract as the two terms of the Spanish contract are One God and you must be baptized a Christian. X is. He then makes a claim he is sovereign as is his land and he derives his authority from Christianity – Jesus the greatest Supreme Court Chief Justice of all time – and from one God. (By now I will have proved God is actual reality and that rights i.e. power and authority are actually inalienable or of, from and by that Creator.) As it is an authority case it is. Because he proved treason it is and there is no argument against it. You and I have renegotiated the governing contracts on behalf of women and all ethical citizens at this point. US law is restored. As I stood down Congress you and I do have the power to make treaties. First X’s sovereignty like my own is acknowledged. He himself is sovereign and his property is a sovereign nation. We ask X if under the restored contract he is willing to submit to the authority of the US? Will he enter a treaty? He says YES with one named term: As he and his wife took a vote abolishing the old form and instituting a new form (they voted for their own Declaration once they filed suit as their sovereignty is the moment they put it in the US mail as money is honor bound) he demands: The US must change ALL MEN to ALL HUMANS. You and I agree as ALL MEN became repugnant and HUMAN has been proven elegant and of God as Susan can also prove to you Darwin is wrong: WE WERE NEVER MONKEYS! HE MISSED SOMETHING!!! I can and will prove HUMANS were never monkeys and we did come from God. It’s obvious as if I resolved uniformity? I have the missing link. Men completely overlooked it!!! Go read what I entered about France and the DC zoo. We are humans of God and the nature of God is both male and female. John Roberts: If I cannot prove it beyond a reasonable doubt? I do not say it. I bet you had no idea why I entered the national zoo: The orangutans. In all of the world that exhibit is unique. So on behalf of the US’ best interests, you, John Roberts, agree to that term proving you are the legal Chief Justice and you can preserve, protect and defend the Constitution including women and their children thus act in defense of humanity. We already know I can as I’m standing here. I did that in order to get here. Thus X then hands his ‘nation’ over to the US and we cede the property back to him under the authority of US law but his title, the result of our treaty with him, will be allodial having been derived from God not from an earthly king. Other allodial titles came from earthly kings but we are no longer tied to those treaties once we died as a just nation; we are not the same now and so as only we are elegant in all the world we then begin anew. .X’s title came from God through Jesus or so he told me. He almost yelled at me when he thought I was dissing Jesus. He said You have to come through Jesus; are you saying you do not??? X is Christian; he went through Jesus to God and came to own his authority; then he found me, as he knew he had a constitutional case and it was about the Executive as he named police powers. I not once discussed it with him thus he owns the knowledge on some level. He could have told me any fact at all; he chose to name that exactly. X proves Christianity is universal and elegant if you follow what Jesus said is directly of God not if you follow the institution like a manmade church or a foreign government. He also proves US law is elegant as you can follow the institution if it too is elegant. Had Jesus formed an actual government? He would have instituted what constitutes US law. X understood institutions are never constitutions unless they are filled with living people who also act elegantly or obey the law and its spirit. When he almost yelled at me? He said, you mean the institutions. I said YES, as man creates them. Paul is not Christianity’s prophet; Jesus is. X agreed. So he knew the difference. It can be an institution of government, theology or science. It’s only a constitution – LAW OF THIS UNIVERSE - if it’s true, fact and correct and if people themselves model it or live it out as real thus proving it as they become liberated and justice is created. Jesus said it is a living church and it is. I have an idea re those original jurisdiction governors; can you guess what it is? I’ll look into it and get back to you. Anyway: I bring up the rear - Jews as I can prove Melchizedek and as I can trace the ten commandments around the world to our two governing documents – thus Faith and Reason is united; the lost remnants are reunited here and truly, the church is built upon a rock – EARTH – as I argued allodial title back to common X DNA so X could then make his claim via his mother. The US inherits the Earth. Justice is restored. An elegant government and law is reborn. The most perfect union. (See the very last page I included as you’ll laugh at most perfect over more perfect after reading it). Do you get what I am doing? We prove US law as it is written originally, Judaism aka Ten Commandments (letter of law) as they are written originally, Christianity as it is written originally (spirit of law) are all elegant and that in the US faith and reason, all of it, is united under Marbury V Madison and Marbury V Madison is elegant itself thus a law and so then is SCOTUS. We use all of history and all of time to prove the vote and to prove that vote is a power and it floats a citizen and SCOTUS; that each citizen is to embody the law, become the living word, or else you actually and legally have no power and no authority. This power and authority is of God or is nature itself; it is the law of this universe and is what set this all in motion as the first cause. Our vote is an outside symbol of this power or first cause the same way sacraments are outside symbols. I’m President; you’re Chief Justice; X is the citizen who used his vote to then secure a title derived from God. You and I and X all acted, as we knew the commission existed and rights are inalienable. It took X to realize this on an actual piece of paper: A title saying GOD instead of KING. See? The meek do inherit the Earth. The point we are making is that the citizens derive authority and power upon their own will and liberty as they volunteer. If they volunteer to obey the law and the spirit of the law? Their will then matches the will of God and this is only in America. The universe is working with them and for them not against them. X is acknowledging the new government we instituted with you and I as the authorities making it legal and it is like a Markov chain for the citizenry: From this point on their decisions are no longer dependent upon past actions, or, given the present state of the nation, future states are independent of the past states. There is no discovery; we have finally been discovered as we know the absolute and whole parameters of our law as I reasoned equality as law of this universe matching physics and theology as well as exact words and math so not as theory. Math is not a theory nor is history! It is! My application is not theory or personal belief; if it was? I would not be on the SCOTUS docket, you would not be reading this and X would not have that title. Oh yeah: He also proves that you inherit US law thus your right via your mother not your father as you never know who your actual father is but always know who your mother is plus mothers not fathers are responsible for the emotional safety or moral authority of children; if your mother is it then you are it; if she teaches it to you then you become it. Think of me as this nation’s founding mother as without me X could not make his case and this nation would not survive the present state. Without me? You John Roberts might not have a job, lol, as sometimes dissolution is outside of our control if we pass the point of no return.” Hopefully you’ll understand after reading my brief if you do not now.
Second, from a letter to this property owner as he asked Why & How the state came to be able to use police powers re collecting taxes: “Judicial interprets the law, Legislative makes the law & Executive enforces the law aka police power. YOU VOTED THAT'S HOW THEY HAVE THE 'RIGHT' TO ENFORCE A TAX VIA POLICE ACTION. YOU AGREED TO THAT WHEN YOU VOTED FOR PRESIDENT AS THE GUY YOU VOTED FOR USES ILLEGAL POLICE POWERS TO ENFORCE THE 13TH AMENDMENT AGAINST OUR WILL & THE LAW. NOT ONE PRESIDENT EVER SAID NO EXCEPT ME AS THEY NEED TO FUND THE FED BUT I DO NOT. I AIM TO TEAR DOWN THE FED & I HAVE THE MEANS TO DO IT. IF THE PRESIDENT CAN & MAY THEN THE STATE & COUNTY CAN & MAY. IT, INJUSTICE, TRICKLES UP FROM YOU AKA YOUR VOTE & THEN DOWN FROM THE PRESIDENT. THE LAST ELECTION CONSTITUTES TREASON & SEDITION FOR WHICH THE VOTERS ARE GUILTY BUT DID THEY KNOW WHAT IS IN MY NEVER FILED YET ACTED UPON PETITION? NOPE. THEY HAD NO idea the last three ELECTIONS CONSTITUTED ACTUAL TREASON, A COUP, & GAVE US A POLICE STATE. DID THE MEMOS WAKE YA ALL UP??? YOU HAVE A CASE AS JOHN ROBERTS DENIED YOU INFORMED CONSENT WHEN HE REFUSED TO FILE MY CASE AS HE DID NOT WANT YOU KNOWING WHY THE ELECTION WAS NOT LEGAL!!!! YOU LIVE IN FL, HOME OF BUSH V GORE; YOU LIVE IN ST.JOHN'S COUNTY THUS GROUND ZERO: I WAS CONCEIVED THERE AND SO I INVOKED MY RIGHTS AS A RESIDENT OF FL WITH THE FBI IN DECEMBER 2006 WHEN NY CONFESSED TO COMMITTING CRIMES AGAINST ME BASED UPON MY CONCEPTION IN ST.JOHN'S COUNTY, FL. I 'DEFECTED' FROM NY WITH MY KIDS CITING MY CONCEPTION AS I WAS THEN BORN IN NY NOT FL BUT ONLY I GOT OUT. NY HELD MY KIDS HOSTAGE AND STILL IS. THE SOLICITOR FIRST WAIVED ALL OF YOUR RIGHTS AND WHEN I OBJECTED ON BEHALF OF THE CITIZENS HE THEN FAILED TO RESPOND THUS BREACHED THE CONSTITUTION. THEN ROBERTS ACTED TO DENY YOU INFORMED CONSENT SO YOU COULD NOT DEFEND YOURSELF. HE TRIED TO BURY MY CASE ON THE DOCKET AS IT SEEMS AS IF ALL IS WELL AT FIRST GLANCE. THEY CHANGED MY CAPTION FROM IN RE JEFFERSON TO IN RE SUSAN TO SQUASH ANY PUBLICITY. THEY MEANT TO BURY IT AND TO HARM ALL CITIZENS. THE RESPONSE WAS DUE 11/05! THERE WAS TIME TO STOP THAT ELECTION BUT THE SG FAILED TO RESPOND ON PURPOSE AS I NAILED HIM: ROBERTS USED TO WORK FOR THE SG BEFORE HE WAS A JUSTICE. A CONFLICT, PERHAPS? IS THE SG PROTECTING ROBERTS AT OUR EXPENSE? THE SG & I ARGUED. I KNEW NOT TO VOTE AND I COULD NOT AS MY RIGHT IS DENIED ME; DID YOU AS YOU WERE NOT INFORMED THAT IF YOU VOTED YOU WERE AGREEING AND YOU WERE THEN WAIVING ALL OF YOUR RIGHTS? DID YOU KNOW THEY COULD USE THE POLICE OR MILITARY OR ANY FORCE TO COLLECT ALL TAXES WHEN ALL ARE NOW LEVIED UNJUSTLY??? OR TO SILENCE YOU BY TOSSING YOU IN JAIL? YUOU CANNOT USE THE LAW TO FIND THOSE WHOM YOU FIRST REFUSED TO EXTEND THE LAW TO THUS YOU MAY HAVE NO RECOURSE AS YOU FAILED TO OBJECT. YOU ONLY VOTED AS YOU DID NOT KNOW YOU WERE AGREEING TO THIS, YOU DID NOT KNOW ABOUT BUSH V GORE BEING BAD MATH AND I WAS NOT ALLOWED REDRESS TO THEN INFORM YOU; IN OTHER WORDS: I WAS NOT ALLOWED TO PRESERVE, PROTECT & DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION ONLY AS I AM A WOMAN, SMARTER THAN ALL MEN & MORE COURAGEOUS TO BOOT. THEIR TRUE BELIEF IS: WOMEN ARE DEFECTIVE; THAT GOD CREATED THEM DEFECTIVE OR LESS THAN MEN AS THEY TOLD ME THAT WITH EXACT WORDS ON THE PHONE!!! WOMAN. MOTHER, NONLAWYER. THEY THREATENED ME AND THEN THAT THREAT WAS MADE REAL. NO TAXES? NO SALARY FOR FED EMPLOYEES SO I SAID: HEY! YOU HAVE A VESTED INTEREST IN SEEING ME LOSE AND SEEING OUR LAW OVERTHROWN OR ELSE YOU HAVE NO JOB AS FORGET YOUR SALARY - YOUR VERY APPOINTMENT WAS NEVER LEGAL AS I PUT MY REASONING AGAINST BUSH V GORE ON THE RECORD IN A PHILLY COURTROOM IN DECEMBER OF 2000 - BEFORE YOU ACCEPTED THE COMMISSION KNOWN AS CHIEF JUSTICE! AS I KNEW & I OBJECTED YOU AREN'T LEGAL AND NEVER WERE. I PRESERVED MY STANDING AND I HAVE SQUEAKY CLEAN HANDS. THAT'S A CONFLICT YOU CANNOT OVERCOME SO STEP ASIDE AND ROBERTS DID. NOW IT'S A STALEMATE WHICH I AM ABOUT TO WIN. YOU DO HAVE AN AIRTIGHT CASE BUT IT HINGES ON ME AND MY CASE PLUS THAT 400 YEAR OLD CONTRACT. ROBERTS ACTUALLY NEEDS YOU BUT YOU DO NOT NEED HIM. LIKE ME YOU MAKE HIM LEGAL AND THEN THIS 'NEW' NATION AKA OUR CONSTITUTION LEGAL AGAIN. LAND PATENTS ARE NO GOOD AS WE OVERTHREW THE DECLARATION & CONSTITUTION FROM WHICH THEY DERIVED THEIR LEGALITY. WE OVERTHREW THE ORIGINAL LAW THEN EVEN ELECTED A NEW UNJUST LEADER OF THIS NEW UNJUST NATION THUS NOTHING IS DERIVED FROM THAT ORIGINAL DOCUMENT ANYMORE AND WE MOST CERTAINLY ARE NOT GOING TO ABOLISH THAT ONLY TO FORM A GOVERNMENT WHEREBY ONLY LANDOWNERS ELECT THE PRESIDENT. Why, the first thing I'll do is strike down the land patent born of an Earthly King as we no longer share that history with Britain or any nation if we overthrew our law and so the elector based upon land ownership is no more once I restore justice as that is not equal so you can chase it but you are wasting your efforts. All original treaties are no good. Get it? A Markov chain of causation whereby given the present state of the nation, future states are independent of the past states aka past land grants based upon treaties or our ties with Europe. THE ORIGINAL US ENTERED THEM NOT THIS NEW UNJUST US THUS ALL FELL. WE DIED AND I WILL RESUSCITATE US. I might use the original jurisdiction governors to do something but not to secure land patents of Kings and/or crooks.”
I have a good reason to end land patents born of a King and electors based on property ownership. Property owners are deemed to have a vested interest; yes but women have a vested property interest that supercedes that as we shed blood but a land owner might not; I can then do something in order to offer you remedy and relief if I jettison property owners as electors based upon patents derived from a King. You want title that is allodial and of the Creator as your vote is of God not any King and not any human authority. and if that so-called authority is a crook? PUHLEEZ; "Crook" is unconstitutional; by their very natures they are authorities when it comes to BREAKING THE LAW NOT ENFORCING IT. Why are you letting the crooks usurp all of the power? The actual power is yours - if you claim it.
Do you see where I am going? An original jurisdiction President, orignial jurisdiction governors, the court of original jurisidiction re constitutional authority and original jurisdcition voters. If I overturn this election and asume the office and then we hold a new election, new candidates have to be chosen and Congress may not do it as they openly and directly committed treason and sedition and I stood them down about two years ago. They made 511 a quasi law by sending it the House Judiciary Committee thus circumventing SCOTUS & us. The original jurisdiction governors could address the candidates on the ballot as you did not know, did you? They could become the legal governors and so unseat the sitting ones as the law is what do you know, when do you know it and when did you act? O.j. governors have been acting while regular type business as usual crooked governors have been participating in criminal activity. “Governor” Crist out of FL announced he was elected only so he could then leave for the soon to be vacated Senate seat; since when do you run knowing you are not willing to fulfill the term? THE TERM? Trust me: I have actual solutions for everything. Sometimes you abolish the false or mistaken construct in people’s heads that no longer matches actual reality. Do you know how many people would support this? Desperation reasons Obama; people would actually support o.j. more so than any other claim as it is the Declaration and Constitution in its purest form; it’s not convoluted reasoning; it’s not theory; nobody is using words to confuse the citizens or to sway the Justices. The argument is: Self-evident.
The person I wrote this to is not willing to make his case in SCOTUS with or without my help so I am fishing to see if I can catch another person or even several who might be willing as this could go another way entirely. I have ties to all 50 states but a landowner from St. John’s County, FL has the purest standing. If you end up making your own case (it is not that difficult) I would have to teach you constitutional law – contract law – and make scertain you owned the knowledge. I could argue the case as I am the only qualified person and as I entered the SCOTUS bar but if I do I need to know that you own the knowledge. I’m in Neptune Beach. [An aisde: The 400 year old contract? It sat on a shelf in Spain and not one person knew; when it was found and translated? Nobody recognized it for what it is. Guess who led me to it? John Marshall! I saw De Soto on the back of an old US bill, a $500 note, which Marshall is on the front of and so went looking and bingo. We inherited this contract when we purchased LA but never knew of it.]
Read my federal appeals brief and think about it and mail me any ideas you have or mail me if you are interested in learning constitutional law from me, the nation’s foremost expert and authority, and possibly becoming the second pro se case of constitutional authority and original jurisdiction. Lawyers cannot do this as they have unclean hands and caused this problem, lol. I cited lawyers and speechwriters as my point of causation: Nixon’s “Checkers” speech meant to place blame on women and children and to ‘change’ your reality by denying it – it being that illegal war chest. He said it was all right to use cute puppies to then justify amassing illegal funds in secret. He said PAT & THE GIRLS made me do it; the guy who gave us the cute little thing is a good, kind, innocent soul. You would deny my girls a puppy? What warchest? The only warchest I possess is filled with puppies. You bought it. They meant to stop women and persons who are black form voting in large blocks for the first time as they were begininng to liberate themselves thus they bought the election. I should not tell you this but I will: A lawyer can make an argument; he or she cam make a claim if they can argue that their license does not by its nature exclude them; that person would have to argue to protect the interests not for the whole class but for the absolute class: ME. That’s all you’re getting.
The link to my brief, “Judicial Review Is The Myth Of Fingerpints”, is:
www.scribd.com/doc/14719526/Herbert-V-Obama-Federal-Appeal-0910661C
Marbury only lost as he did not act after leaving SCOTUS to then claim his award. I did not make this same mistake. Start at page 60 “Summary Of Argument”. Then email me as the o.j. governors have clean hands as they knew and they acted; they took matters into their own hands as US law and Marbury V Madison says you must. As you are. You’re in this forum, aren’t you?
Susan, for if Marbury is the cornerstone then I am the capstone.
Hey guys! I have a suit in the other federal court, appeals. I have been to SCOTUS; I became the first person to enter directly since Marbury in 1803 and the only woman and the only nonlawyer to argue a case as if you’re pro se? Your case is heard upon conferencing but I went one better: The Solicitor General failed to respond thus as I am a pro se case of constitutional authority and original jurisdiction I then sued the US by appealing to Roberts directly thus I gained direct entry and direct action but: YOU were denied all of your rights and informed consent. Hang with me for a sec as I am on my way back into SCOTUS and I have an idea for how we can put the original jurisdiction governors to use: I’m o.j., correct? Well in my suit I named the governors of all the states as they do have the power of one thus they could have been granted third standing in Bush V Gore to then prevent Bush V Gore and/or to prevent Obama 08. In case you missed it: BVG is a coup. A coup in America is papery first and then bloody. BVG? It sat as a tied decision until I resolved it in my favor; the SCOTUS docket is proof. Go look at In Re Susan Herbert 07-9804, “Being American Is A Matter Of Faith Not Of Belief As Life Is Proof” & 08-6622, “A Natural Born Citizen, A Past Actual President And A Current Legal President Denied Justice Absolutely As Discrimination Is Real Thus Appearances Are Deceiving Which Is Why Acting Defines You And Life, Not Death, Is Proof”. The action known only as 11/20/08 is not the same as 08-6622; it is an emergency appeal that was acted upon but not filed. I captioned that “A Natural Born Citizen Who Is A Mother And So Shed Her Blood And Risked Her Life In Defense Of The Constitution, Or, We The People Thus The Protected Right Is Hers”. This is the application and petition that secured my place in US history, lol, as I never went to a lower court and not only was heard but I was acted upon (Marshall said actions not paper count or prove the case) and the Chief Justice may not circumvent the Solicitor General as that then is denying you all of your rights and the ability to defend yourselves.
BVG is 9 as 5-4 as 2, 5 as 1 versus 4 as 1 or 1 versus 1. So then: As we overthrew our governing documents and then the citizens elected a person not qualified the nation died; it no longer is as it was. We are no longer constitutional as Roberts proved as Marshal said if a citizen ever got to the Chief Justice and was denied redress for fully protected rights then we were not a constitutional nation as we had chosen something over the constitution itself. In my case first SCOTUS violated the law and then Marbury and then it violated all of you but I was the only one to object so now I may sue Roberts and the US for liability. To overthrow the law is one thing; to then elect a leader that is acting in violation of our law on the way into the office? A coup by the Congress backed by private business as Obama used private funds. This is where you were and are supposed to get out your pitch forks and torches but you did not. You’re spirit was broken as that is what happens if you wholly violate the law, even the spirit of the law itself: you break people. It also makes me the acting, legal President and Commander. I told Roberts: The citizens already elected me once; they already voted for me once: I was my grammar school class President. When in SCOTUS I actually issued Executive Orders and signed them as such and SCOTUS obeyed. I will get to my point in a sec and I’ll give you a link to my federal appeals brief but here is what I told a person asking me about police power to enforce the collection of unjust property taxes. Pardon the capitals, as that is how I sent it:
First from a letter to John Roberts re land patents and allodial title as he is a defendant so I can and may give him legal advice as it does not constitute ex parte if he’s defending himself against me: “He (person claiming allodial title) claims authority under the contract I entered that we had with the American Indians, which we inherited from Spain with the LA Purchase. As he proved treason as he asked and got a confession from a former Senator he knew the law was being overturned as early as 2000. I have to check that date. He knew BVG was unconstitutional but he did not own all of the knowledge yet he still acted. He argues all the contracts are undone back to that one. He actually fulfilled all terms of US law and of this 400 year old contract as the two terms of the Spanish contract are One God and you must be baptized a Christian. X is. He then makes a claim he is sovereign as is his land and he derives his authority from Christianity – Jesus the greatest Supreme Court Chief Justice of all time – and from one God. (By now I will have proved God is actual reality and that rights i.e. power and authority are actually inalienable or of, from and by that Creator.) As it is an authority case it is. Because he proved treason it is and there is no argument against it. You and I have renegotiated the governing contracts on behalf of women and all ethical citizens at this point. US law is restored. As I stood down Congress you and I do have the power to make treaties. First X’s sovereignty like my own is acknowledged. He himself is sovereign and his property is a sovereign nation. We ask X if under the restored contract he is willing to submit to the authority of the US? Will he enter a treaty? He says YES with one named term: As he and his wife took a vote abolishing the old form and instituting a new form (they voted for their own Declaration once they filed suit as their sovereignty is the moment they put it in the US mail as money is honor bound) he demands: The US must change ALL MEN to ALL HUMANS. You and I agree as ALL MEN became repugnant and HUMAN has been proven elegant and of God as Susan can also prove to you Darwin is wrong: WE WERE NEVER MONKEYS! HE MISSED SOMETHING!!! I can and will prove HUMANS were never monkeys and we did come from God. It’s obvious as if I resolved uniformity? I have the missing link. Men completely overlooked it!!! Go read what I entered about France and the DC zoo. We are humans of God and the nature of God is both male and female. John Roberts: If I cannot prove it beyond a reasonable doubt? I do not say it. I bet you had no idea why I entered the national zoo: The orangutans. In all of the world that exhibit is unique. So on behalf of the US’ best interests, you, John Roberts, agree to that term proving you are the legal Chief Justice and you can preserve, protect and defend the Constitution including women and their children thus act in defense of humanity. We already know I can as I’m standing here. I did that in order to get here. Thus X then hands his ‘nation’ over to the US and we cede the property back to him under the authority of US law but his title, the result of our treaty with him, will be allodial having been derived from God not from an earthly king. Other allodial titles came from earthly kings but we are no longer tied to those treaties once we died as a just nation; we are not the same now and so as only we are elegant in all the world we then begin anew. .X’s title came from God through Jesus or so he told me. He almost yelled at me when he thought I was dissing Jesus. He said You have to come through Jesus; are you saying you do not??? X is Christian; he went through Jesus to God and came to own his authority; then he found me, as he knew he had a constitutional case and it was about the Executive as he named police powers. I not once discussed it with him thus he owns the knowledge on some level. He could have told me any fact at all; he chose to name that exactly. X proves Christianity is universal and elegant if you follow what Jesus said is directly of God not if you follow the institution like a manmade church or a foreign government. He also proves US law is elegant as you can follow the institution if it too is elegant. Had Jesus formed an actual government? He would have instituted what constitutes US law. X understood institutions are never constitutions unless they are filled with living people who also act elegantly or obey the law and its spirit. When he almost yelled at me? He said, you mean the institutions. I said YES, as man creates them. Paul is not Christianity’s prophet; Jesus is. X agreed. So he knew the difference. It can be an institution of government, theology or science. It’s only a constitution – LAW OF THIS UNIVERSE - if it’s true, fact and correct and if people themselves model it or live it out as real thus proving it as they become liberated and justice is created. Jesus said it is a living church and it is. I have an idea re those original jurisdiction governors; can you guess what it is? I’ll look into it and get back to you. Anyway: I bring up the rear - Jews as I can prove Melchizedek and as I can trace the ten commandments around the world to our two governing documents – thus Faith and Reason is united; the lost remnants are reunited here and truly, the church is built upon a rock – EARTH – as I argued allodial title back to common X DNA so X could then make his claim via his mother. The US inherits the Earth. Justice is restored. An elegant government and law is reborn. The most perfect union. (See the very last page I included as you’ll laugh at most perfect over more perfect after reading it). Do you get what I am doing? We prove US law as it is written originally, Judaism aka Ten Commandments (letter of law) as they are written originally, Christianity as it is written originally (spirit of law) are all elegant and that in the US faith and reason, all of it, is united under Marbury V Madison and Marbury V Madison is elegant itself thus a law and so then is SCOTUS. We use all of history and all of time to prove the vote and to prove that vote is a power and it floats a citizen and SCOTUS; that each citizen is to embody the law, become the living word, or else you actually and legally have no power and no authority. This power and authority is of God or is nature itself; it is the law of this universe and is what set this all in motion as the first cause. Our vote is an outside symbol of this power or first cause the same way sacraments are outside symbols. I’m President; you’re Chief Justice; X is the citizen who used his vote to then secure a title derived from God. You and I and X all acted, as we knew the commission existed and rights are inalienable. It took X to realize this on an actual piece of paper: A title saying GOD instead of KING. See? The meek do inherit the Earth. The point we are making is that the citizens derive authority and power upon their own will and liberty as they volunteer. If they volunteer to obey the law and the spirit of the law? Their will then matches the will of God and this is only in America. The universe is working with them and for them not against them. X is acknowledging the new government we instituted with you and I as the authorities making it legal and it is like a Markov chain for the citizenry: From this point on their decisions are no longer dependent upon past actions, or, given the present state of the nation, future states are independent of the past states. There is no discovery; we have finally been discovered as we know the absolute and whole parameters of our law as I reasoned equality as law of this universe matching physics and theology as well as exact words and math so not as theory. Math is not a theory nor is history! It is! My application is not theory or personal belief; if it was? I would not be on the SCOTUS docket, you would not be reading this and X would not have that title. Oh yeah: He also proves that you inherit US law thus your right via your mother not your father as you never know who your actual father is but always know who your mother is plus mothers not fathers are responsible for the emotional safety or moral authority of children; if your mother is it then you are it; if she teaches it to you then you become it. Think of me as this nation’s founding mother as without me X could not make his case and this nation would not survive the present state. Without me? You John Roberts might not have a job, lol, as sometimes dissolution is outside of our control if we pass the point of no return.” Hopefully you’ll understand after reading my brief if you do not now.
Second, from a letter to this property owner as he asked Why & How the state came to be able to use police powers re collecting taxes: “Judicial interprets the law, Legislative makes the law & Executive enforces the law aka police power. YOU VOTED THAT'S HOW THEY HAVE THE 'RIGHT' TO ENFORCE A TAX VIA POLICE ACTION. YOU AGREED TO THAT WHEN YOU VOTED FOR PRESIDENT AS THE GUY YOU VOTED FOR USES ILLEGAL POLICE POWERS TO ENFORCE THE 13TH AMENDMENT AGAINST OUR WILL & THE LAW. NOT ONE PRESIDENT EVER SAID NO EXCEPT ME AS THEY NEED TO FUND THE FED BUT I DO NOT. I AIM TO TEAR DOWN THE FED & I HAVE THE MEANS TO DO IT. IF THE PRESIDENT CAN & MAY THEN THE STATE & COUNTY CAN & MAY. IT, INJUSTICE, TRICKLES UP FROM YOU AKA YOUR VOTE & THEN DOWN FROM THE PRESIDENT. THE LAST ELECTION CONSTITUTES TREASON & SEDITION FOR WHICH THE VOTERS ARE GUILTY BUT DID THEY KNOW WHAT IS IN MY NEVER FILED YET ACTED UPON PETITION? NOPE. THEY HAD NO idea the last three ELECTIONS CONSTITUTED ACTUAL TREASON, A COUP, & GAVE US A POLICE STATE. DID THE MEMOS WAKE YA ALL UP??? YOU HAVE A CASE AS JOHN ROBERTS DENIED YOU INFORMED CONSENT WHEN HE REFUSED TO FILE MY CASE AS HE DID NOT WANT YOU KNOWING WHY THE ELECTION WAS NOT LEGAL!!!! YOU LIVE IN FL, HOME OF BUSH V GORE; YOU LIVE IN ST.JOHN'S COUNTY THUS GROUND ZERO: I WAS CONCEIVED THERE AND SO I INVOKED MY RIGHTS AS A RESIDENT OF FL WITH THE FBI IN DECEMBER 2006 WHEN NY CONFESSED TO COMMITTING CRIMES AGAINST ME BASED UPON MY CONCEPTION IN ST.JOHN'S COUNTY, FL. I 'DEFECTED' FROM NY WITH MY KIDS CITING MY CONCEPTION AS I WAS THEN BORN IN NY NOT FL BUT ONLY I GOT OUT. NY HELD MY KIDS HOSTAGE AND STILL IS. THE SOLICITOR FIRST WAIVED ALL OF YOUR RIGHTS AND WHEN I OBJECTED ON BEHALF OF THE CITIZENS HE THEN FAILED TO RESPOND THUS BREACHED THE CONSTITUTION. THEN ROBERTS ACTED TO DENY YOU INFORMED CONSENT SO YOU COULD NOT DEFEND YOURSELF. HE TRIED TO BURY MY CASE ON THE DOCKET AS IT SEEMS AS IF ALL IS WELL AT FIRST GLANCE. THEY CHANGED MY CAPTION FROM IN RE JEFFERSON TO IN RE SUSAN TO SQUASH ANY PUBLICITY. THEY MEANT TO BURY IT AND TO HARM ALL CITIZENS. THE RESPONSE WAS DUE 11/05! THERE WAS TIME TO STOP THAT ELECTION BUT THE SG FAILED TO RESPOND ON PURPOSE AS I NAILED HIM: ROBERTS USED TO WORK FOR THE SG BEFORE HE WAS A JUSTICE. A CONFLICT, PERHAPS? IS THE SG PROTECTING ROBERTS AT OUR EXPENSE? THE SG & I ARGUED. I KNEW NOT TO VOTE AND I COULD NOT AS MY RIGHT IS DENIED ME; DID YOU AS YOU WERE NOT INFORMED THAT IF YOU VOTED YOU WERE AGREEING AND YOU WERE THEN WAIVING ALL OF YOUR RIGHTS? DID YOU KNOW THEY COULD USE THE POLICE OR MILITARY OR ANY FORCE TO COLLECT ALL TAXES WHEN ALL ARE NOW LEVIED UNJUSTLY??? OR TO SILENCE YOU BY TOSSING YOU IN JAIL? YUOU CANNOT USE THE LAW TO FIND THOSE WHOM YOU FIRST REFUSED TO EXTEND THE LAW TO THUS YOU MAY HAVE NO RECOURSE AS YOU FAILED TO OBJECT. YOU ONLY VOTED AS YOU DID NOT KNOW YOU WERE AGREEING TO THIS, YOU DID NOT KNOW ABOUT BUSH V GORE BEING BAD MATH AND I WAS NOT ALLOWED REDRESS TO THEN INFORM YOU; IN OTHER WORDS: I WAS NOT ALLOWED TO PRESERVE, PROTECT & DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION ONLY AS I AM A WOMAN, SMARTER THAN ALL MEN & MORE COURAGEOUS TO BOOT. THEIR TRUE BELIEF IS: WOMEN ARE DEFECTIVE; THAT GOD CREATED THEM DEFECTIVE OR LESS THAN MEN AS THEY TOLD ME THAT WITH EXACT WORDS ON THE PHONE!!! WOMAN. MOTHER, NONLAWYER. THEY THREATENED ME AND THEN THAT THREAT WAS MADE REAL. NO TAXES? NO SALARY FOR FED EMPLOYEES SO I SAID: HEY! YOU HAVE A VESTED INTEREST IN SEEING ME LOSE AND SEEING OUR LAW OVERTHROWN OR ELSE YOU HAVE NO JOB AS FORGET YOUR SALARY - YOUR VERY APPOINTMENT WAS NEVER LEGAL AS I PUT MY REASONING AGAINST BUSH V GORE ON THE RECORD IN A PHILLY COURTROOM IN DECEMBER OF 2000 - BEFORE YOU ACCEPTED THE COMMISSION KNOWN AS CHIEF JUSTICE! AS I KNEW & I OBJECTED YOU AREN'T LEGAL AND NEVER WERE. I PRESERVED MY STANDING AND I HAVE SQUEAKY CLEAN HANDS. THAT'S A CONFLICT YOU CANNOT OVERCOME SO STEP ASIDE AND ROBERTS DID. NOW IT'S A STALEMATE WHICH I AM ABOUT TO WIN. YOU DO HAVE AN AIRTIGHT CASE BUT IT HINGES ON ME AND MY CASE PLUS THAT 400 YEAR OLD CONTRACT. ROBERTS ACTUALLY NEEDS YOU BUT YOU DO NOT NEED HIM. LIKE ME YOU MAKE HIM LEGAL AND THEN THIS 'NEW' NATION AKA OUR CONSTITUTION LEGAL AGAIN. LAND PATENTS ARE NO GOOD AS WE OVERTHREW THE DECLARATION & CONSTITUTION FROM WHICH THEY DERIVED THEIR LEGALITY. WE OVERTHREW THE ORIGINAL LAW THEN EVEN ELECTED A NEW UNJUST LEADER OF THIS NEW UNJUST NATION THUS NOTHING IS DERIVED FROM THAT ORIGINAL DOCUMENT ANYMORE AND WE MOST CERTAINLY ARE NOT GOING TO ABOLISH THAT ONLY TO FORM A GOVERNMENT WHEREBY ONLY LANDOWNERS ELECT THE PRESIDENT. Why, the first thing I'll do is strike down the land patent born of an Earthly King as we no longer share that history with Britain or any nation if we overthrew our law and so the elector based upon land ownership is no more once I restore justice as that is not equal so you can chase it but you are wasting your efforts. All original treaties are no good. Get it? A Markov chain of causation whereby given the present state of the nation, future states are independent of the past states aka past land grants based upon treaties or our ties with Europe. THE ORIGINAL US ENTERED THEM NOT THIS NEW UNJUST US THUS ALL FELL. WE DIED AND I WILL RESUSCITATE US. I might use the original jurisdiction governors to do something but not to secure land patents of Kings and/or crooks.”
I have a good reason to end land patents born of a King and electors based on property ownership. Property owners are deemed to have a vested interest; yes but women have a vested property interest that supercedes that as we shed blood but a land owner might not; I can then do something in order to offer you remedy and relief if I jettison property owners as electors based upon patents derived from a King. You want title that is allodial and of the Creator as your vote is of God not any King and not any human authority. and if that so-called authority is a crook? PUHLEEZ; "Crook" is unconstitutional; by their very natures they are authorities when it comes to BREAKING THE LAW NOT ENFORCING IT. Why are you letting the crooks usurp all of the power? The actual power is yours - if you claim it.
Do you see where I am going? An original jurisdiction President, orignial jurisdiction governors, the court of original jurisidiction re constitutional authority and original jurisdcition voters. If I overturn this election and asume the office and then we hold a new election, new candidates have to be chosen and Congress may not do it as they openly and directly committed treason and sedition and I stood them down about two years ago. They made 511 a quasi law by sending it the House Judiciary Committee thus circumventing SCOTUS & us. The original jurisdiction governors could address the candidates on the ballot as you did not know, did you? They could become the legal governors and so unseat the sitting ones as the law is what do you know, when do you know it and when did you act? O.j. governors have been acting while regular type business as usual crooked governors have been participating in criminal activity. “Governor” Crist out of FL announced he was elected only so he could then leave for the soon to be vacated Senate seat; since when do you run knowing you are not willing to fulfill the term? THE TERM? Trust me: I have actual solutions for everything. Sometimes you abolish the false or mistaken construct in people’s heads that no longer matches actual reality. Do you know how many people would support this? Desperation reasons Obama; people would actually support o.j. more so than any other claim as it is the Declaration and Constitution in its purest form; it’s not convoluted reasoning; it’s not theory; nobody is using words to confuse the citizens or to sway the Justices. The argument is: Self-evident.
The person I wrote this to is not willing to make his case in SCOTUS with or without my help so I am fishing to see if I can catch another person or even several who might be willing as this could go another way entirely. I have ties to all 50 states but a landowner from St. John’s County, FL has the purest standing. If you end up making your own case (it is not that difficult) I would have to teach you constitutional law – contract law – and make scertain you owned the knowledge. I could argue the case as I am the only qualified person and as I entered the SCOTUS bar but if I do I need to know that you own the knowledge. I’m in Neptune Beach. [An aisde: The 400 year old contract? It sat on a shelf in Spain and not one person knew; when it was found and translated? Nobody recognized it for what it is. Guess who led me to it? John Marshall! I saw De Soto on the back of an old US bill, a $500 note, which Marshall is on the front of and so went looking and bingo. We inherited this contract when we purchased LA but never knew of it.]
Read my federal appeals brief and think about it and mail me any ideas you have or mail me if you are interested in learning constitutional law from me, the nation’s foremost expert and authority, and possibly becoming the second pro se case of constitutional authority and original jurisdiction. Lawyers cannot do this as they have unclean hands and caused this problem, lol. I cited lawyers and speechwriters as my point of causation: Nixon’s “Checkers” speech meant to place blame on women and children and to ‘change’ your reality by denying it – it being that illegal war chest. He said it was all right to use cute puppies to then justify amassing illegal funds in secret. He said PAT & THE GIRLS made me do it; the guy who gave us the cute little thing is a good, kind, innocent soul. You would deny my girls a puppy? What warchest? The only warchest I possess is filled with puppies. You bought it. They meant to stop women and persons who are black form voting in large blocks for the first time as they were begininng to liberate themselves thus they bought the election. I should not tell you this but I will: A lawyer can make an argument; he or she cam make a claim if they can argue that their license does not by its nature exclude them; that person would have to argue to protect the interests not for the whole class but for the absolute class: ME. That’s all you’re getting.
The link to my brief, “Judicial Review Is The Myth Of Fingerpints”, is:
www.scribd.com/doc/14719526/Herbert-V-Obama-Federal-Appeal-0910661C
Marbury only lost as he did not act after leaving SCOTUS to then claim his award. I did not make this same mistake. Start at page 60 “Summary Of Argument”. Then email me as the o.j. governors have clean hands as they knew and they acted; they took matters into their own hands as US law and Marbury V Madison says you must. As you are. You’re in this forum, aren’t you?
Susan, for if Marbury is the cornerstone then I am the capstone.